Compares justice in BILLY BUDD, and TWELVE ANGRY MEN

Changing Verdicts The trials in both billy Budd and Twelve aggravated workforce have a jury of sorts, and in each story, the members of these juries be near unanimous in their decisiveness, scarce one individual dust who would vote against his/her fellow jurors. As it happens, both juries all told miscellanea the verdict from what it appeared each jury would have sooner voted. I hope to show you the similarities/differences of these two stories by exposing slanted verdicts and the accompaniment that one person falsifyd the final verdict in both cases. The trial of Billy Budd is a quick one, but preferably a lot of decision-making takes place. Three of the officers on Billys direct (the unofficial Corps) are trying to come to a decision as to what should be done about the murder of Claggart. They get laid Billy is guilty of the crime, but are willing to sack him on the base that Claggart had it coming to him. The only witness to the crime, victor Vere, reminds the DC that a crime was committed, whether malice was intentional, or unintentional, and that the DC should non bias their verdict simply because Billy is a upended person: What shame to us such a muse on their part, and how deadly to discipline.

You see then, whither, prompted by duty and the law, I steadfastly drive. But I beseech you, my friends, do not take me amiss. I feel as you do for this lamentable boy. But did he know our hearts, I take him to be of that generous nature that he would feel even for us on whom in this military necessity so tramp a compulsion laid (Melville 70). All of the members of the DC change their verdicts when they fetch that they have bee! n biased from the... If you want to get a fully essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay